Last weekend was a brilliant one in our local community. On Saturday, nine different congregations worked together to put on a Family Fun Day on Streatham Common. Over 2000 people came.
Then, the next day, a joint ‘Messy Church’ service was held on the same spot to which the whole community was invited. Lots of people who don’t normally come to church came along. The whole thing was organised by Love Streatham (who my wife works for) which brings together the churches in Streatham to show God’s love to our community.
The functions of Church
It got me thinking about the importance of mission in the life of the Church and reminded me of a seminar I went to a few years ago led by Mike Frost where he outlined four functions of church:
- Discipleship – learning and growing in following Jesus
- Worship – praise and prayer to God, participating in the sacraments
- Fellowship – building relationships within the church
- Mission – going out to share the gospel in words and actions
Worship as ‘the controlling function’
The seminar focussed on the idea that one of these will always be ‘the controlling function’. Frost argued that it is generally worship, via a Sunday morning service, which is the controlling function around which everything else has to work. This could be presented as such:
When worship is in the lead role, each of the other three functions are organised around it. Thus discipleship is chiefly done via a sermon at the Sunday gathering; fellowship is done after the service over coffee. Mission primarily becomes the activity which seeks to draw people to the Sunday service.
Many Christians have become deeply disillusioned with this approach. Whether they are part of traditional churches or newer, charismatic congregations, the focus on the Sunday meeting easily becomes dissatisfying. Its because it leads to a very concentric form of church, focussed in on itself as an institution. Instead of focussing outwards, the church becomes focussed on keeping its current members happy.
In turn this increases denominationalism, deepens a sense of competition between congregations, entrenches disunity and worst of all, neglects mission. The church becomes a club which looks after its members.
Mission as the controlling function
In contrast, Frost promoted the idea that Mission should be the controlling function:
This was not because mission is more important than discipleship, worship or fellowship. As Mike Breen has powerfully argued, without discipleship, mission will always fail. The reason that mission should be the controlling function is because each of the other three functions are best served when the overall focus of church is missional and outward facing.
This utterly rings true to my experience. It has been when I have engaged in mission, whether through short term mission trips and events, or longer term community projects, or through decisions about where I live or where I work that I have grown most in discipleship. Also, my fellowship with other Christians has developed most through doing outward focussed work together: this has deepened my relationships with other Christians more than any amount of church attendance has. And it is living out my faith in the real world which has most enriched my worship. The best way to deepen prayer and praise is through depending on God.
The meaning of Church
In the brilliant (and highly recommended) book ‘Christianity Rediscovered’, Vincent Donovan writes:
‘Mission is the meaning of the church. The church can exist only insofar as it is in mission, insofar as it participates in the act of Christ, which is mission. The church becomes the mission, the living outreach of God into the world. The church exists only insofar as it carries Christ to the world. The church is only part of the mission, the mission of God sending his son to the world. Without this mission, there would be no church. The idea of church without mission is an absurdity’
His thinking is very similar to Lesslie Newbigin’s about the essentially missionary nature of the church. We need to be reminded continually of this – because as a church we are seriously addicted to buildings and meetings. Mission is not a department of the church but its very nature; its very reason for being.
As Chris Wright has written:
‘God does not have a mission for his Church; He has a Church for His mission’
10 thoughts on “God does not have a mission for his church”
I don’t neccessarily agree with the statement that “God does not have a mission for His church but a church for His mission.” Jesus pointed out on more than one occasion that His priority is His people and the relationships both vertically and horizontally. The secret is in the “love your neighbour as you love your self” part. That is what most of us find difficult and causes us to turn our attention on programs and every nice distraction from ‘the great commission’.
‘The great commission’ is nothing so segregated as going Out There and finding the Unchurched. EVERYWHERE and EVERYONE is the “Mission Field”. Paul, for instance, gives credit not only to the missionaries he mentored and worked with, but also to those who ran the churches.. Programs, when properly used to renew and empower, are not “nice distractions”, but an integral part.of maintaining and deepening the collective ability of reaching people with the love of God that comes through us(including ourselves!). Pitting church vs missions is counterproductive and destroys the work done through both of them.