Ethics & Christian living

Whistleblow and the sheep-guarders: a parable

Once upon a time in the town of Northrun, there was a shepherd called Whistleblow.

He was one of many shepherds who worked for Lord Northrun who owned most of the land in the area. Each shepherd had their own flock to look after.

Whistleblow was loud and had strong opinions, but he was fair, honest and a good shepherd. He knew his flock well, whether they be old ewes or young lambs. He knew how to find the best pastures and keep them safe. His sheep trusted him and the flock grew in number.

Wolves

Safety was important because in the fields of Northrun lived many wolves who could be dangerous. Whistleblow was good at protecting his flock. He would keep a watchful eye and then act quickly to deter any wolves causing harm.

In the neighbouring flock to Whistleblow’s, one particularly notorious wolf had attacked lots of sheep over a long time. The situation had not been dealt with well and it had caused a lot of harm across the whole area.

Sheep-guarding officers

So because of these risks, Lord Northrun decided to hire a specialist team of ‘Sheep-guarding officers’ to help ensure the flocks were protected.  These Sheep-guarding officers had not actually done any shepherding themselves, but he was impressed by their presentation, paperwork and procedures.

The Sheep-guarding officers instructed the shepherds in the new arrangements. In amongst lots of guidelines and protocols, the shepherds were told that they must never interact with the wolves themselves. When a wolf appeared, they must call one of the sheep-guarding officers in to deal with the situation. 

Concerns

Whistleblow was concerned about these arrangements and was not sure they would work. The sheep-guarding officers did not know the sheep like he knew them. They also did not know which wolves to really keep an eye on. And how would they respond in time?

But he thought the Sheep-guarding officers must know best, after all, some of them had post-graduate qualifications in Sheep-guarding!

Attacks

A short time later, some wolves did attack Whistleblow’s sheep. He called the sheep-guarding officers but there was no reply.  He tried again but there was no response.  The sheep-guarding team were all in a team meeting and could do not be disturbed.

So with his sheep at risk, Whistleblow tackled the wolves himself. He chased them away and ensured that little damage was done.

He thought that the Sheep-guarding officers would be pleased with what he had done as he had protected the sheep.

Anger

The next day, the Head of the Sheep-guarding saw the messages from Whistleblow and told her Personal Assistant to make an appointment for her to see him. When she arrived she said ‘I am here to deal with the wolves’. So Whistleblow told her all that happened and what he had done.

Instead of being pleased, the Head Sheep-guarder was angry.  “You failed to follow procedure. You are not trained to get directly involved.”

‘But…I protected the sheep’ replied Whistleblow ‘Isn’t that the most important thing?’

But the Head Sheep-guarder said ‘Its far more complicated than that. Remember, you are only a simple shepherd, I am the expert’ and she stormed off.

More attacks

A few weeks later, Whistleblow’s sheep were attacked by wolves again.

Again, Whistleblow contacted the Sheep-guarding team but again no answer.  The team were at a 3-day residential training course on Advanced Sheep-guarding.

A month later the same thing happened a third time. Again, no answer. This time the team were away at a hotel for the Annual National Sheep-guarding Awards ceremony.

Paperwork

Whistleblow thought he should let Lord Northrun know what was happening and why the approach of the Sheep-guarding team was not working.

So he wrote down all the details about the attacks: what the wolves looked like, the times it happened, the names of the sheep that were attacked and the action he had taken.

He sent his report to the Sheep-guarding team, Lord Northrun and also to some other shepherds who were friends.

Incandescent

When the head sheep-guarding officer read Whistleblow’s report she was incandescent with rage.

What did a simple shepherd know about sheep-guarding? She was one of the foremost sheep-guarders in the country! How dare he pass comment on their professional work!

She went straight to Lord Northrun and insisted that Whistleblow was sacked.

Lord Northrun said ‘I will not tolerate being disobeyed and we must take action. But we need to think about how – I cannot really accuse him of not protecting my sheep.’

The Head Sheep-guarder replied ‘Well you need to do something. If you don’t clamp down on this Whistleblow, then you and I will lose far more than a few stupid sheep.’

……………………..

Let the reader understand: see this statement

14 thoughts on “Whistleblow and the sheep-guarders: a parable”

  1. I’m sorry to read about your brother’s suspension. The parable you’ve created here applies to so many situations, and on a more meta-level, we’ve collectively lost our way. The sheep are doing fine, the humans, not so much.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. THanks for sharing this parable Jon – I think parables are such a great way to teach and yet we (myself included) don’t use them enough – they get round the frontal cortex. SO important to highlight this kind of institutional “professionalism” and how often it fails people. You must be proud to have a brother like Stephen.

    Like

    1. Thanks Mark. Yes – he has stood up and been brave and its terrible to see him being treated in such an unjust way. Hopefully it will all be cleared up soon and he can resume work.

      Like

  3. An excellent treatise an esposé, of the true nature of “sheep guarders. They only want what’s best for themselves, not the sheep, there supposed to be responsible for. They clearly dont hear His voice….🤔

    Like

  4. I am so sorry to read about Stephen in the Church Times, as an abuse survivor of Southwark and fully aware of the Head sheep guarding officer who has left me near the edge of self destruction at times I am very upset to read about his treatment. The wolf that attacked me has been shuffled down the lane and no one has told him off and none of his new flock know. How can the wolf that attacked me not warrant a CDM and your courageous shepherd brother face this treatment, it is unjust and deeply distressing.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s