Sport

‘What game even is that?’: Two factors to save cricket’s future

Addington 1743 cricket ground, Croydon

I play cricket each week on a ground where the game has been played since 1743. A couple of weeks ago, a group of local children came past the ground. We are used to hearing comments shouted out, but on this occasion something particularly struck me. One teenage girl turned to her friends and said:

‘What game even is that?’

Think cricket is boring? I understand that.

Shouting ‘You’re s**t arrghh’. No big problem.

But this girl did not even recognise what sport was being played.

Not even registering

It struck me that if England win the World Cup in a few weeks-time or the Ashes in a few months, it will not even register with a huge number of people in the UK.

As I have written before, the worst decision ever made by English Cricket was to switch from free-to-air TV and take Sky’s cash. This is the key moment which shifted cricket from the nation’s summer game to an increasingly elitist sport. Those running English cricket saw the price of the contract but ignored the value of what they lost.

Public profile

In the era when cricket was on free-to-air TV, players had a national public profile far greater than the superstars of today. In 2005, I was one of thousands in a packed Trafalgar Square when England celebrated the epic Ashes win. It was national event because millions had been gripped by the spectacle of a great contest.

But this was the last summer like that because every series since has only been broadcast on Sky. England won the Ashes in 2009 but hardly anyone noticed.

Cricket’s popularity will never be equal to the passion for football.  But it has a very strong latent form of support which is awoken by great contests or characters like Ian Botham, Viv Richards or Andrew Flintoff who capture people’s imaginations.  It requires a platform which understands this.

Engaging younger players

One of the key reasons is that public profile is important is because it is directly linked to local engagement.

My school hardly played much cricket, but England’s win in the 1985 Ashes series helped inspire me, along with a group of school mates, to join the local cricket club. In 1987 we won our league and ended up playing at The Oval, the same ground we had seen David Gower lift the Ashes urn on the TV just two years before.

Thirty-two years later I am back at the same club I joined as a 14 year old. I manage a youth side and last year this team won the same league as I did as a player. I also Captain the 4th XI and encourage young players to make the step into adult cricket.

Challenges and opportunities

For generations, cricket has tinkered with its rules and formats to make it more interesting. Some of these, such as the growth of shorter forms of the game have been very positive. But more than these changes, I think there are two factors which will secure the future of cricket – one national and one local:

Firstly, we need a better national profile for the sport – and this means having tournaments like the World Cup and Ashes back on free-to-air TV. When the ECB selects the best deal, it should factor in the ability of millions to watch it, not just the thousands who access Sky.

But secondly, we need clubs which are relentlessly welcoming and friendly to new players.  We need clubs who are prepared to embody cricket’s unique potential as a force for inclusion.

Social inclusion

More so than many sports, cricket can be genuinely inter-generational and kids can play competitively alongside people old enough to be their grandparents. This week, I had the great experience of opening the batting with my 14 year old son. It was fantastic – until I ran him out.

Also, cricket is uniquely inter-cultural with a huge number of black and minority ethnic people heavily involved. I have learnt more about Islam and Ramadan from playing cricket than from anywhere else. Where else do so many Muslims, Hindus, Christians and people of no faith come together?

Also, it’s a sport where women can play alongside men. Youth teams are frequently mixed and in my first league match this season I played against a young woman playing for her club’s 3rd XI.

And it’s also a sport which can include people with disabilities. Already this season, I played a match against a skilful bowler with a physical disability and a regular player in our 4th XI is a young man with learning difficulties. His passion and enthusiasm for cricket is contagious.

‘What game even is that?’

This will be an amazing summer for cricket with a home World Cup followed by The Ashes.

‘What game even is that?’ is a question that needs to be answered.

And this is the job of both those who run the game nationally and those who run local clubs. We need both national profile and local engagement to inspire and enable more young people to experience this great game.

10 thoughts on “‘What game even is that?’: Two factors to save cricket’s future”

  1. Some very good points, Jon
    Maybe you might consider making this case in a national paper? Or letting the ECB see the blog?
    May be you have already?
    Shalom
    Alan
    PS come and visit Headingley sometime!

  2. The ECB decision was so short-sighted. I do have to regularly check the channel lists, but it is possible to watch cycling in the summer on free-to-air channels. ITV presumably makes enough money from the adverts to be worthwhile showing whole days of Tours, even though these are mainly shown on Eurosport. I have greatly enjoyed watching you, Danny and Tom at cricket matches.

  3. Anyone for tennis?
    Or korfball for a game designed for men and women to play together.
    I love the plaintive cry for cricket: Newham cricket club is multi-ethnic as you suggest.
    And my walking football club is multi-everything – learning disabilities, parkinson’s, mental health, youngsters, women.
    So I suspect you are conflating two things – the long term value of having cricket on free-to-view tv, and the power of sport rightfully applied to be kingdomly inclusive and deliver genuine breakthrough.

  4. Does anyone else see a parable here about how both institutional Christianity and local churches need to adapt?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s